Mr. Angry of mid-Wales..

It happens in the run-up to every election. I listen (and watch) in vain for anything relating to the environment in the BBC current affairs output (see here and here). Nowhere (with the exception of Channel 4) this year have I seen or heard any political party being tackled on their policies on climate change or nature/wildlife. It is as if there is a conspiracy of silence between the politicians and the journalists. Neither party is interested in discussing these things. Actually – I tell a lie: a couple of weeks ago I heard a trailer for exactly what I was hoping for – on the farming programme on Radio Four at 5.45 in the morning. Whoever listens to the radio at that time of day!

Last Thursday I happened to be listening to “Feedback” on Radio 4 which – in case you’re not aware – is nominally independent of the BBC. It features complaints and comments on the organisation’s output and often tackles senior BBC figures on important issues. The presenter read out two complaints from listeners about the complete lack of coverage of the large (very large apparently) ‘Restore Nature Now’ demonstration which took place in London towards the end of June. He/she reported that the BBC had been approached to answer these questions on air but had refused to do so. They just sent a short statement justifying their position.

I was furious! I immediately emailed Feedback with my own complaint about the BBC’s poor or non-existent coverage of environmental issues in its election broadcasting. I included the following points –

  1. How are voters concerned about the environment above all else (like me) supposed to know which way to vote? It is a complete dereliction of duty on behalf of the BBC, despite their ability to produce stunning wildlife documentaries containing powerful environmental messages.
  2. Millions of people in the UK are members of charities and pressure groups supporting wildlife conservation and renewal. All of us would dearly love to know what the political parties intend to do about these things but thanks to the BBC we are no wiser. It is disgraceful.

Well, fortunately, with a big thumbs up to Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace , we are now able to make a decision on which party to support. Between them they have examined the manifestos of the three main parties plus the Greens. It is the latter who top the ratings with an almost perfect score of 39 points out of 40. But you would never know it from their election publicity or their statements in the media. Why this fear of publicly putting the environment at the heart of every policy? The Lib Dems do pretty well too. Needless to say the Tories are by far the worst in every respect, although personally I believe their record over the past few years (especially under Boris Johnson) is not as bad as is made out.

Here in Ceredigion we have a Plaid Cymru MP, Ben Lake, who by all accounts is an excellent constituency MP. He was one of the very first to officially support Caroline Lucas’s Bill (now known as the Climate and Nature Bill) to put the environment first, which has not (yet) made it onto the statute book. But he has not responded to any of my recent correspondence on environment matters. Personally I have never trusted Plaid Cymru, as they tend to rely on the farmers’ vote in rural Wales. It was noticeable how Ben Lake made himself very visible at some of the farmers protests back in the winter.

So there you have it! If you have not yet decided how to vote in order to put the environment first, I do recommend looking at the FoE/Greenpeace document. There is a link to it below.

https://friendsoftheearth.uk/system-change/general-election-2024-manifestos-final-scores

To read more Tales from Wild Wales as they are published, please click the Follow button.

(Still) shooting itself in the foot…….. (Part 2)

Firstly if you’re a landscape or wildlife photographer wanting to hear my opinions on the latest piece of kit or technique – my apologies. I’ll get back to photography in due course. But the first part of this post (see here) has proven to have been read by far more people than anything else I have written in the past eight years, and I have a couple of updates.

Firstly, a comment on my piece from Tony Johnstone went like this:

Wild Justice did not win their case at all, this is false news put out by a failed attempt to stop Game Shooting. DEFRA issued an open licence with regard to EU SSI’s and all other UK SSI’s are already covered by existing UK laws. Please get your facts right.

I didn’t suggest that Wild Justice “won their case” but nevertheless Tony Johnstone did have a point. The case did not get as far as court because prior to the hearing DEFRA agreed that gamebird shooting should be subject to licensing (in England, inside and within 500 metres of a site protected by European law). I realised that I needed to understand more about gamebird shooting and the law. In particular I needed to know what “open licences” were, or “general licences” as they are actually called.

A general licence is deemed to be held by anyone, providing certain conditions are met, without needing an application to be made. A general licence is required to control agricultural pests such as crows and woodpigeons, plus introduced species like canada geese; or to protect endangered wildlife species or human or animal health. Please note, however, that this is a very condensed version of the situation and I Am Not A Lawyer. For more complete details see the Guns on Pegs website.

DEFRA is making general licences available for the 2021 -2022 shooting season as a temporary measure. More research will take place meanwhile on the actual impacts of gamebird releases on the environment. When that has been completed, decisons will be made on what new conditions to impose on the gamebird shooting industry. Wild Justice have a list of actions they expect to be considered in setting up a new licensing scheme. Whether they “won their case” or not depends on how many of these ultimately turn out to be included. For more information see this post.

The second thing I’d like to mention here is this: on November 12th I walked up the Llyfnant valley to observe the shoot that was taking place on that day. I kept a very low profile, carefully using public rights of way (where they weren’t blocked) and open access land. I left my van at the end of the public road adjacent to the entrance to Cwmrhaiadr. When I returned I found that two of my tyres had been slashed.

EDIT: For a much better (but much longer) explanation of General licences, please click on this link –https://wildjustice.org.uk/general/general-licences-in-general-and-our-challenge-to-the-nrw-general-licences-in-particular/

NB 1: Guns on Pegs is a shooting website but their summary of the situation is far more straightforward than, for example, the BAS(C) website, with all its spin and prejudice.

NB 2: Following the DEFRA decision, which is only valid in England, the Welsh Government is opening a consultation on the subject of gamebird shooting.

To read more Tales from Wild Wales as they are published, please click on the Follow button